Digital SLR Selection Guide
Last Update: 15 March 2006
The Only Web Site Dedicated Exclusively to Providing Unbiased Information on Digital SLRs
News
Nikon Offers to Repair D200 Digital SLRs with Banding Problem
Nikon doesn't Rule Out
Full Frame D-SLR
"We have been
exploring the possibility of commercializing a 35mm full-size sensor,
but it's not clear at this moment if we go for it." Makoto Kimura of
Nikon.
Olympus Introduces E-330--First Digital SLR with Live Preview
Konica-Minolta Exits Digital Camera Business, Sony to take over D-SLR portion of the Business
This site was created in order for there to be an easy to use source of objective information on the subject of digital SLR cameras. The question, "what should I look for in a digital SLR," is something that isn't answered in marketing and advertising material promulgated by the camera manufacturers.
While it is unwise to select a camera based solely on features and specifications, many people have found it useful to use the specification table, along with the Absolute Requirements and Other Important Considerations sections, to help narrow down their choices. Once you've narrowed down the field to cameras that fit your requirements, you can evaluate the remaining models more subjectively, using the various unbiased (relatively) review sites (see http://stevesdigicams.com, http://dpreview.com, http://www.hardwarezone.com, http://www.dcresource.com, and http://luminous-landscape.com/reviews/). Be very wary of biased review sites.
It should be emphasized that different individuals look for different attributes in the equipment they choose. Statements like: 'xyz feature is obviously unimportant because I don't need that feature,' are unhelpful (and are usually made in the context of defending the absence of a particular feature on a particular camera). I have prepared several comparison charts of features that buyers often look for. Image quality is always important, but it is not the sole consideration in the selection of a camera. For example, some buyers may no be comfortable with the size and weight of one of the higher end cameras, and may be looking for something lighter and smaller. Some buyers may be looking for a very high frame rate, but are willing to sacrifice some resolution in order to get it.
Cutting to the chase, here are the best digital SLRs in Each Segment. Click the links in the right column to purchase them from Amazon or Adorama.
Entry-Level
Analysis: Canon has no camera in this segment. The D50 beats the entry level models from Konica-Minolta, Pentax, and Olympus. Canon is coming out with the EOS-3000D as a competitor to the D50, but the specifications of the EOS-3000D are not impressive. Unless price is the over-riding concern, the next segment up offers a better price to value ratio.
Amateur
Analysis: The Rebel XT is the better choice if you're not already committed to the Nikon lens mount, unless you absolutely need spot metering.
Prosumer
Analysis: Tough choice between these two cameras. Canon has a better selection of lenses, especially image-stabilized lenses, and is lower noise. The D200 is higher resolution, and includes spot metering. You might want to wait a month and see what Canon brings out as a replacement for the two-year old 20D. A 30D is rumored for February 2006, with 10.1 megapixels, and a larger LCD. It is a virtual certainty that Canon will respond to the Nikon D200 with a replacement for the 20D.
Semi-Professional
Canon EOS-5D. $3000 Full-frame capability and a 12.8 megapixel, low-noise sensor, make this a winner. Nikon has no models in this segment. |
Body: |
Analysis: Canon has this segment to themselves.
Professional
Canon EOS-1D Mark II. $4000 | Body: |
Nikon D2x. $5000 | Body: |
Analysis: Despite the lower resolution of the EOS-1D Mark II, the 1.3 crop factor, and the low-noise sensor, make this a better choice than the higher resolution Nikon D2x, unless you are lens-committed to the Nikon mount. Canon is rumored to be coming out with a replacement for the EOS-1D, the EOS-3D, which will be in the 12 megapixel range, and will be full-frame.
High-End Professional
Canon EOS-1Ds MarkII. $8000 Full-frame capability and a 16.7 megapixel low-noise sensor make this the only high-en professional digital SLR. |
Body: |
Analysis: Canon has this segment to themselves. There are rumors that Nikon will announce a high-end professional, full-frame D-SLR in 2006, the D3H, as a replacement for the D2H.
D-SLR
Specification Table
(in order of resolution)
This table is useful for making quick comparisons of features. This can help you quickly eliminate models that don't meet your needs from consideration. Also see Comparison Charts of Key Features for bar graphs. Please e-mail me if you find any errors in this table, or if you think that additional columns should be added.
Comparison Charts of Key Features
Sometimes you just want to do a quick comparison of key features, without going to one of the camera review sites. We prepared these charts to facilitate this.
Click on Thumbnail to See Bar Graph | |||||||
Focal Length Multiplier | Frame Speed | Resolution | Sensor Dimensions | Body Size | Body Weight | Pixel Pitch | Pixel Density |
On this site, the digital SLR market is divided into five segments, entry level, amateur, prosumer, professional, and medium format. Medium format is not included on this web site at this time. We separated the EOS-1Ds Mark II into "High End Professional" since it really is in a class by itself, and has no competition (which is why Canon can charge so much for it!).
Market Segment Chart by Manufacturer versus Segment
Market Segments |
|||||||
Entry Level | Amateur | Prosumer |
Semi Professional |
Professional | High End Professional | ||
Canon | EOS-350D | EOS-30D | EOS-5D | EOS-1D Mark II | EOS-1Ds Mark II | ||
Fuji |
S2 Pro S3 Pro |
||||||
Konica-Minolta | Dynax 5D* | Dynax 7D | |||||
Nikon | D50 | D70s | D200 | D2x, D2Hs | D3H (coming soon) | ||
Olympus | E-500 |
E-1 E-330 |
|||||
Pentax | *ist Ds2, *ist DL | *istD | |||||
Samsung | GX-1S, GX-1L |
Market
Segment Classification Criteria
These criteria have been crafted in order to divide the
available digital SLRs into the commonly accepted market segments. None of
this is absolute, or worth getting upset about. There are arguments that could
be made for different placements.
The segments are determined by a
combination of factors, including image quality, quality of construction,
features, and price. Actual megapixel resolution is not a major factor (only
when the resolution is extremely low, is it considered).
There is a distinction between the level of the equipment and the person that uses it. Certainly a professional photographer might buy a Nikon D70, but this does not change the features or quality of the camera. Conversely, a well-off amateur might buy a Canon EOS-1Ds Mark II, but that does not put the EOS-1Ds Mark II into the amateur category. Some people love to post platitudes such as "it's who's behind the camera that makes it professional or not," but they do not understand the difference between equipment and photographers.
Professional
x
At the high end of the
professional level you have
full-featured cameras with top-of-the line, high resolution, low-noise,
full-frame sensors (1x crop factor), or close to full frame sensors, and
mirror lock-up.
Prosumer
x
These cameras have
lower resolution than the professional models, but will have more features
and are better constructed than the amateur models with the same sensors.
Cameras in this category include the Canon EOS-20D, the Nikon D200, and
the Fuji S3 Pro and S2 Pro.
Amateur
x
These cameras have
similar resolution to the Prosumer models, but may have some features
removed, and may have a lower grade of material for the body. Cameras in
this category include the Canon EOS-350D (Digital Rebel xt), the Nikon
D70s,
and the Pentax
*istD. The Nikon D70s was difficult to
categorize, as in many ways it is much better than the other cameras in
the amateur segment. But the D70s lacks key prosumer features such as
mirror lock-up and vertical grip connections.
Entry Level
x
These are low-priced, de-featured
models, for people that want a digital SLR at the lowest possible price.
Older models sometimes move into this category as they are eclipsed by
newer models.
Cameras in this category include the Nikon D50,
the Olympus E-330,
the Pentax
*istDs2, and the Konica-Minolta Dynax 5D.
Summary of Attributes to Consider
Enter the selection process with an open mind, but be certain to consider various attributes of each model you are looking at. These are some of the things you need to look at during the selection process:
Resolution
Crop Factor
Lens Mount
Lens Availability in terms of both focal lengths and quality
Noise
Moiré
Accessory availability, especially vertical grips, flashes, and remote controls)
Upgrade path from the manufacturer (are there better bodies and lenses available)
Battery Type (AA NiMH or Proprietary Li-Ion)
Continuous Frame Rate
Mirror Lock-Up
Spot Metering
Memory Card Type (Compact Flash or Secure Digital)
LCD Size
Viewfinder Magnification
Shutter Rating (cycles)
Size and Weight
Ergonomics
Price
Minimum 6 megapixel resolution
x
There really is no reason to go below 6 megapixels at this point in time.
You don't want to go crazy looking only at megapixels, but you also want
to have sufficient resolution for large prints. The few sub-6 megapixel
D-SLR cameras are all rather old models that few people would consider
buying anyway, and the one recent model that is 5 megapixels has enough
other issues to eliminate it from consideration. The Nikon D2H/D2Hs is an
exception to this requirement, for those users who need very high frame
rates, and a large buffer.
Maximum of 1.6 Crop Factor if Using Existing Lenses from full frame Film
D-SLR
x
The crop factor (focal
length multiplier) mainly relates to how wide angle, a wide angle lens
actually is. For instance, with a 1.6 crop factor, a 10-22mm lens is
actually equivalent to a 16-35 lens on a 35mm camera. Amateur, prosumer,
and some low-end professional digital SLRs have crop factors from 1.5 to
2.0. Try to stay at 1.6 or under if using the same mount as a 35mm
camera.
Lens
Availability, Price, and Quality
x
Lens availability and quality should play a key
role in your selection of a digital SLR. The crop factor means that you
can't simply go by what is available for a 35mm full-frame camera.
The biggest problem with lenses
has been in the super-wide-angle zoom, but this has now been solved (or is
in the process of being solved), at least for non-professional quality
lenses:.
-Canon has the 10-22 EF-S (35mm equivalent: 16-35)
-Konica-Minolta has announced the AF DT 11-18mm (35mm
equivalent: 16.5-27)
-Nikon has the 12-24 DX (35mm equivalent: 18-36)
-Olympus has the Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm (35mm equivalent:
14-28)
-Pentax has announced the DA 12-24 (35mm equivalent: 18-36)
Look at differences in price for the lenses you want. For example, for the
Canon 20D, 300D, and 350D, a popular wide-angle lens is the EF-s 10-22,
which you can purchase for around $650 on sale. For the Nikon D70 and
D100, the similar quality, Nikon 12-24mm DX sells for about $930 at the
lowest priced, reliable on-line vendor (though you can get the import
version for $900 from B&H Photo). A major advantage of Canon is that they
distribute their products via more channels than Nikon, so there is more
price competition.
One advantage of Nikon's using a 1.5 crop factor in their professional
models is that there are more lenses available that compensate for the
crop factor. I.e. Nikon offers a 10.5mm FishEye lens, but Canon has
nothing close to this lens. Apparently Canon's position is that if you
want this wide of a prime lens, then you should be buying a Canon body
with a smaller crop factor; this is a disappointment because so many
professionals are going with the Canon 20D, due to its more reasonable
price, and they have no very wide angle prime lens available for the
20D.
The limitations of the Nikon lens mount mean that certain lenses than
Canon has, are simply not possible. These are mainly the very fast, and
very expensive, professional lenses, such as the Canon 50m/f1.0 and the
85mm/f1.2. If you really need such fast lenses, then you will need to go
the Canon route.
For some reason Nikon does not produce VR (Vibration Reduction) lenses in
focal lengths greater than 300mm, while Canon has 400mm and a 600mm
telephotos with IS. These are very expensive ($6500-7000) professional
lenses which an amateur would be unlikely to purchase, but which are used
by many professional sports photographers. Again, if you really need such lenses, then you will need to go
the Canon route. Remember, if you need one of these lenses for an
occasional shoot, you can rent one.
Canon EF-s lenses cannot be used on their higher-end models, the EOS-5D,
1D Mark II and 1Ds Mark II. Keep this in mind when you purchase lenses,
as there are several highly desirable EF-s lenses for the 20D and 350D.
If you upgrade to full-frame in the future, these lenses can no longer
be used. On the plus side, used Canon lenses have a very high resale
value, so you can recoup 60-80% of your initial purchase price.
Professional versus Consumer Grade, Wide Angle, Zoom Lenses |
Very-wide angle zooms have become popular due to the focal length multiplier on consumer and prosumer digital SLR bodies. In order to retain true wide-angle capability (18mm maximum), you need a much wider zoom than was the case on 35mm cameras. Canon, Nikon, Olympus, Pentax, Konica-Minolta, and Sigma, have all introduced lenses that compensate for the focal length multiplier, and give back the wide-angle capability that was lost due to smaller sensors. Canon has the 10-22 f3.5-4.5 EF-S USM, and Nikon has the AFS 12-24 mm f/4 G ED IF DX. The Canon lens gives an equivalent zoom range of 16-35.2mm, and the Nikon lens gives an equivalent zoom range of 18-36mm. These lenses are fine, but they are all rather slow at the wide end, and also exhibit chromatic aberration and distortion when wide open. They are also rather expensive for non-professional lenses. Professional photographers will often need better quality lenses, both in terms of optics, and in terms of construction. While both Canon and Nikon manufacture professional grade, wide-angle, zoom lenses, neither has manufactured a professional super-wide-angle zoom lenses that compensate for a 1.5 to 1.6 focal length multiplier. Such a lens would be very expensive to manufacture. The widest wide-angle professional zoom from Nikon is the 17-35mm f/2.8D ED-IF, which would have zoom range of 25.5-52.5mm on a Nikon digital SLR with a 1.5 focal length multiplier (all Nikon digital SLRs have a 1.5 crop factor). The widest wide-angle professional zoom from Canon is the EF 16-35mm f/2.8L, which would give an equivalent focal length of 25.6-56mm on a Canon non-professional digital SLR (1.6 focal length multiplier), 20.8-45.5mm on the 1D Mark II (1.3 focal length multiplier), and 16-35mm on the 1Ds Mark II (1.0 focal length multiplier). For photographers that need a fast, professional grade, wide-angle-zoom, on a professional body, the only choice is an EOS-1Ds Mark II paired with the EF 16-35mm f/2.8L. Even the Canon EOS-1D Mark II, with its 1.3 crop factor, gives you only 20.8mm on the wide end, which is not enough. Nikon has not yet introduced a digital SLR with a focal length multiplier of less than 1.5. Canon is able to charge $8000 for the 1Ds Mark II, and sell all that they can manufacture, simply because they are the sole source for a high-quality, low-noise, full-frame, digital SLR. |
Low noise & Accurate Color, at least up to ISO 400, Preferably up to ISO
800
x
Some D-SLRs have high
resolution sensors, but have high noise levels at higher ISO settings.
Other D-SLRs lose color accuracy at higher ISO settings.
For low noise at very high ISO settings (1600), you're limited to cameras
from Canon and Fuji. These two companies, which manufacture their own
sensors, have taken radically different approaches in their sensor design.
The up-side of the Canon sensors is that they deliver better color
accuracy than Fuji's sensors. Even the Nikon D2x disappoints, with
unacceptably high noise above ISO 800.
Accessory Availability
x
Ensure that any
accessories that you may be interested in, are actually available (not
just promised). These include such items as vertical grips, dioptric
adjustment lenses, eyepiece extenders, off-camera flash shoe cords,
remote controls, etc. For example, Nikon does not make a vertical
control grip/battery holder for the D70s (though vertical grips are such
a crucial accessory to many people, that three aftermarket vertical grips
are now available (Harbortronics
VG-D70 or
Hoodman HVPG-D70
or
Merkury MI-BG-N70)). There is a
battery grip (no shutter-release) for the Nikon D50, see
MI-BG-N50.
Pentax has a
vertical grip for the *istD, but not the *istDs. After-market
accessories are usually only developed for the most popular, high-volume
models of cameras.
Remote
Control
x
A remote control is a useful feature for including
yourself in photos, or for taking photos when you are not close to the
camera. Wireless remotes can use infrared or radio-frequency. The
advantage of a radio-frequency remote is that it does not require
line-of-sight, but infrared capability is much less expensive to
implement. Wired remotes connect to a jack on the camera. You cannot
really take a photo of yourself, using an infrared remote, because you
will be seen pointing the remote at the camera, but with an RF or wired
remote, which isn't line-of-sight, you can press the button with a foot,
or have the remote hidden in your hand. Of course you can use a self-timer
without the need for a remote.
While a wireless remote seems like it would always be better than a wired
remote, this is not always the case, especially for infrared remotes.
There are bite switches, foot switches, and automated controllers that
require a wired remote. If you need this capability, be certain that it is
provided in the body that you select. Infrared remotes are the cheapest to
implement on camera bodies, and lower-end bodies will often omit a jack
for a wired remote (extra plugs and jacks add a lot of cost to a camera
body). A wired remote jack can be added to the Nikon D70 and Fuji S2, see
http://www.harbortronics.com/BodyMod.pdf, but it is an
expensive modification. One of the feature upgrades on the Nikon D70s is a
wired remote jack.
It really sucks that Canon did
not include infrared or RF remote capability on the EOS-20D, only a wired
remote can be used (a wireless remote receiver that plugs into the wired
remote jack is available from Canon, but it is very expensive). There are
also aftermarket wireless remotes for the Canon D30, D60, 10D, 20D, 1D,
1DS, 1D Mark II, Nikon D100, and Fuji S3 at
http://www.brightscreen.com/remote.htm, but even this costs
$230.
http://www.adidt.com/English/Products/R3_prices.htm
seems to be the best deal, at $150 plus $25 shipping from China (available
only on eBay).
Many cameras also allow remote control via the USB interface.
Upgrade
Path
x
If you expect to move
up from amateur to prosumer, from prosumer to professional, select a
system that allows this transition without buying every piece over again.
If you have professional aspirations, don't start buying lenses for a lens
mount that doesn't have any professional bodies available.
Using Older Nikon Lenses with the Nikon's Digital SLRs |
Nikon aficionados continue to make much of the fact that Nikon has retained the F mount since 1959, while Canon switched from the FD mount to the EOS mount in 1987 (destroying the resale value of the FD lenses, and making them incompatible with EOS bodies (though there was a professional grade adapter available)). The truth is, that while Nikon hasn't changed the mechanics of the mount, they have made numerous changes over the years that have made some of their older lenses less functional with newer bodies, or have made them totally unusable. Do not mount pre-AI lenses on newer Nikon bodies. They will damage the camera. See http://www.bythom.com/lensacronyms.htm for a good article regarding which Nikon lenses work with which bodies, with which functionality. There is a service that will add matrix metering to older Nikon lenses, so that they will meter properly on newer Nikon bodies. See http://home.carolina.rr.com/headshots/Nikonhome.htm |
Please also see: What a Professional Looks for in a Digital SLR
Other Important Considerations
There are often features and capabilities that amateurs will ignore when researching products. They do this because they either do not understand, or cannot imagine, the need for those features and capabilities. However, as they become more experienced, they may regret not having those features and capabilities available.
We will attempt to explain some of these features and capabilities, and why they are useful. Beware of advice that goes something like this: "you don't need feature XYZ because I never use it;" Just because someone else doesn't need a specific feature doesn't mean that you don't need it.
Continuous Frame Rate
If you need to
shoot frames in rapid succession, i.e. for fast action sports photography,
look at the frame rate spec. Three frames per second should be the
minimum, but some very high end models can do eight frames per second.
Also look at how long the frame rate can be sustained, which is dependent
on the buffer depth. Once the buffer is full, the camera cannot take any
more photos until the contents of the buffer are transferred to the slower
FLASH
memory.
Batteries--Proprietary, AA, or
Both
x
While NiMH AA
batteries are slightly cheaper than proprietary NiMH or Li-Ion packs, they
are not as energy dense, and they have a much higher self-discharge rate
(than Li-Ion batteries). Most D-SLRs have a vertical grip accessory, which
allow the use of either Li-Ion or AA batteries. Most D-SLRs do use Li-Ion
batteries, but some older models, and a few newer models, were designed
for AA batteries only. Many of the AA models can use the RCRV-3, a
rechargeable lithium-ion cell that is the size of two AA cells.
Some people are philosophically opposed to Li-Ion battery packs, because
of their proprietary nature. However the mainstream D-SLRs, such as those
from Nikon and Canon, have after-market Li-Ion battery packs available at
very good prices. The one practical aspect of AA batteries is that if you
ever find yourself with discharged batteries and no power source, you can
buy AA batteries in most places in the world. A vertical grip that can use
AA batteries is a good compromise, offering both the advantages of Li-Ion,
and the emergency availability of AA cells.
See http://batterydata.com for more
information on the trade-offs of battery types. This web site was
developed to counter some of the myths regarding Li-Ion and NiMH
batteries.
Battery
Chargers
Ensure that there
are chargers, either from the camera manufacturer, or after-market, that
allow you to charge batteries in a vehicle, without the use of a DC to AC
inverter. Lenmar makes a wide variety of such chargers.
Lenmar MSC1USB Mach 1 Fusion All-In-One Speed Charger with USB Output |
This charger can charge nearly every Li-Ion camcorder or digital camera battery, as well as NiMH AA and AAA cells. It has a USB connector for using USB charging cords for cell phones, PDAs, and other devices that can be charged via USB (simultaneously with charging batteries on the adapter plate). It can be powered by AC, or by an included car cord. This charger will end the excuses regarding Li-Ion batteries! There is also a version without the USB output (MSC1U). Buy from Digitally Unique for $53. It comes with adapter plates for the most common batteries, and you can buy plates for most other Li-Ion batteries (the Lenmar plate listing is incorrect, since many of the non-highlighted battery types actually are supported with the plates that come with the charger). It comes with one free adapter plate (download coupon) if you send them your UPC code and $3. Good camera stores that carry Lenmar will stock the plates ($10) each. See http://www.lenmar.com/mach1_fusion_usb.asp but the Lenmar site is not very complete. Supplied Plates and Connectors Since the Lenmar site doesn't tell you what comes with this charger, I will. It comes with five plates, but each plate supports multiple batteries. Plate for 4 AA/
4AAA cells (must be charged in pairs) |
Uses Same
Lenses from Manufacturer's Film Models.
x
If you already own a
bunch of lenses from a Nikon, Pentax, Canon, or Minolta film camera, this
will play a big factor in your choice of digital SLR. For example, if you
were choosing a camera based solely on image quality, you'd avoid the
Pentax *istD and *istDs, but if you already have a load of compatible
lenses, the small difference in image quality would probably be
acceptable.
x
Mirror Lock-Up
x
Mirror lock-up delays the shutter
release for a few seconds. This allows vibrations that are caused by the
pressing of the shutter-release and the action of the mirror flipping up,
to stop prior to the shutter being released. This feature is normally used
when the camera is on a tripod (shutter release vibration can also be
eliminated by using the self timer), with slow shutter speeds, and long
lenses.
x
Note that while the old Canon EOS-300D didn't come with mirror lock
capability, there is a firmware hack that adds this feature. The EOS-350D
does have mirror lock-up as a standard feature. There is no way to add
mirror lock-up to the Fuji S2 Pro, Nikon D70/D70s, or the Olympus Evolt E300.
Note that
dpreview.com, and B&H Photo's web site, incorrectly state
that the Pentax *istDs does not have mirror lock-up (it does have it).
Do not confuse the mirror lock-up function used to get the mirror out of
the way in order to clean the sensor (i.e. what occurs on the Nikon D50/D70s),
with true mirror-lock functionality.
Compact Flash (CF) Memory Cards
x
For point and shoot
cameras, Secure Digital memory is okay, since you can now purchase 1GB SD
cards for not much more than 1GB CF cards. But for high resolution digital
SLRs, you may want to buy 2GB and 4GB memory cards, especially if shooting in RAW mode, which uses a lot of memory per
photo. There are some 2GB SD cards available, but that's the top limit as
of now. CF cards are available in 4GB and 8GB as well as smaller sizes.
x
Almost every D-SLR does use Compact Flash, so this isn't a difficult
criteria to meet, but for some reason (probably cost), Pentax went from
Compact Flash to Secure Digital on the *istDs (the *istD uses Compact
Flash), and Nikon went to SD on their entry level D50. Pentax may have wanted to draw a clear distinction between the two
cameras, with one being amateur level, and the other being prosumer level,
but the real result will be a loss of sales to the Nikon D70 and Canon
EOS-350D.
Be sure to buy fast memory cards, rated at least 40x. Slow
cards are a pain in the butt, both when shooting large numbers of pictures
in rapid succession, and when transferring data from the card to the
computer. Compact Flash card pricing varies a lot by reseller. At this
point in time (January 2006), a 2GB card (50x) sells for around $100, and a
1GB card sells for around $75. 4GB cards are much more expensive per MB.
Some people like to use several smaller cards, since if a card fails not
all photos are lost.
USB 2.0 and/or
Firewire (IEEE1394) Interface
x
For high speed transfer without
removing the memory card from the camera, you want to avoid cameras that
are only USB 1.1, or "Full Speed" USB 2.0. Some people may not care about this because they prefer
to remove the card to a card reader, but it's better for the camera to
minimize the number of insertion/removal cycles of the memory card.
Note
that even on cameras with USB 2.0, you will not get the full transfer rate
of 480 Mb/s (versus 12 Mb/s of USB 1.1); the actual rate will depend on
the camera's electronics, firmware, and the speed of the memory card.
Watch out for camera manufacturers that claim USB 2.0 support but add the
term "Full Speed USB." "Full Speed USB" is 12 Mb/s
maximum, the same as USB 1.1. Read http://www.everythingusb.com/usb2/faq.htm
for more information on the
"Full Speed" versus "Hi-Speed" scam, but remember that
even cameras that actually do provide true USB 2.0, will not actually
transfer data at the maximum theoretical rate.
USB 2.0 is probably better for most people, since nearly every new PC has
USB 2.0 as standard. Many of the low-end PCs don't have Firewire ports
(though they can be added to desktop PCs very inexpensively). Computers
from Apple all have Firewire and USB 2.0. Click
http://www.softwareandstuff.com/
and search for
"Firewire" to find inexpensive PCI and CardBus/PCMCIA adapters for
Firewire.
LCD Size
x
LCD sizes vary from 1.8" to 2.5".
In general, the larger the LCD size, the better. The slight downside of a
larger LCD is that it runs the battery down slightly faster.
x
Viewfinder Magnification
x
This is a personal preference. A viewfinder with
a high magnification gives you a better view of your subject, and makes it
easier to do manual focusing, but if it's too big (i.e. >= 0.95x, then you
have to move your eyes around a lot in order to see the whole scene. On
the other hand, a viewfinder with a smaller magnification allows you to
see the whole scene, but it may be harder to see details and harder to do
manual focusing, and below 0.8x there is a "tunnel-vision" effect.
Somewhere between 0.8x and 0.9x is fine, especially if, like most users,
you don't use manual focusing very much. You probably don't want to go
below 0.8x or above 0.9x, unless you have some special need, but this
should not be a deciding factor in the selection of a camera.
x
Size and Weight
x
There are big variations in size and
weight between models. Size and weight are personal preferences. Do not
believe that smaller and lighter are necessarily better. The size of your
hands, and a weight you feel comfortable with, are important
considerations. Many people do not like a camera that is too light, but on
the other hand, many people will find that the heavy cameras are too
tiring to hold for long periods of time. Remember that AA batteries weigh
more than Li-Ion battery packs and are less efficient in terms of energy
storage, both in terms of size and weight.
Body Size Bar Graph (Click Thumbnail) |
Body Weight Bar Graph (Click Thumbnail) |
= |
Ergonomics
x
Ergonomics is something that is difficult to
measure objectively. You need to feel comfortable with the placement of
dials and controls. Some cameras have more buttons and dials than others,
and allow direct access to features that on other cameras may require the
use of menus. Read several reviews on the cameras you are considering, and
see what the reviewers say about the ergonomics. There is a learning curve
with any complex camera, and some people make too big a deal of minor
annoyances that go away once the user becomes familiar with the camera.
Shutter
Rating (Cycles)
Camera shutters have finite
lifetimes. Entry level and amateur cameras usually have ratings of around
50,000 cycles, prosumer models have ratings of up to 100,000 cycles, and
professional models often have ratings up to 200,000 cycles. Don't laugh!
It is entirely possible to reach these numbers over the life of the
camera. Of course in most cases you'll be able to go longer than the
rating, the camera doesn't instantly fail once you reach the rated shutter
cycles, but it is something to look at if you're deciding between say a
Nikon D100 or a Canon 20D, or between a Canon EOS-350D and a Canon 20D.
Only Canon and Nikon actually disclose their shutter life cycle ratings,
but you can pretty much be assured that the manufacturers that don't
disclose their numbers, keep them secret for a reason.
Sensor Technology
x
The type of sensor technology,
generally CCD or CMOS, need not be a consideration in the selection of a
camera. In general, CMOS sensors are less noisy, but there are noisy CMOS
sensors, and relatively low noise CCD sensors as well. You should look at
results, not the sensor type. There is a good article about Canon's
cutting-edge CMOS sensor technology at:
http://www.letsgodigital.org/en/news/articles/story_2588.html.
The advantages of Canon's sensor technology are difficult to overcome.
Canon is an engineering-based company, that designs and manufacture all
critical sub-systems of their high end products themselves, while most
other D-SLR manufacturers (except Fuji) simply buy sensors from Sony or
Kodak. Nikon has produced one sensor (used in the D2H/D2Hs), and is
believed to be working on its own CMOS sensors, in an effort to catch up
with Canon. Having to buy sensors from another company, is analogous to an
automobile manufacturer having to buy engines from another company, rather
than manufacturing their own.
x
Moiré
x
The higher the sensor resolution,
the greater the danger of moiré. Moiré is basically an issue where
extremely fine detail is not resolved correctly, due to aliasing. Moiré
elimination is a fine point of sensor and anti-aliasing filter design, as
removing it in post-processing is difficult. You can read about what Canon
has done to reduce moiré, at
http://www.letsgodigital.org/en/news/articles/story_2588.html.
Excessive moiré is an issue on the Nikon D70, but not on the Canon digital
SLRs.
x
Pixel
Pitch
x
Pixel pitch is an issue because due
to semiconductor physics, the smaller the pixel size, the greater the
noise. Pixel pitch is not always an accurate indicator of the noise
levels, since some cameras with large pixel pitches still have excessive
noise. For example, the Foveon sensor used in the Sigma SD9 & SD10 has a
large pixel pitch, but is much noisier than the smaller-pitch sensor in
the Canon EOS-20D. Canon has proven to be especially good at keeping noise
levels down even as the pixel pitch shrinks. See the article
Digital Cameras: Does Pixel
Size Matter?
for more information on this subject.
x
There are noise issues with very small pixel pitches. The Kodak KAF-8300CE sensor, used in the Olympus E-300, has a pixel pitch of 5.4 microns, the smallest of any CCD (this is necessary because the sensor is very small, with a 2.0 crop factor for the 4:3 system). The new Nikon D2X has almost as small a pixel pitch as the Olympus, 5.5 microns, and has noise issues that are inexcusable for a camera as expensive as the D2X.
Pixel density is simply the number of pixels per square millimeter of sensor area. In general, the lower the pixel density the better, because it implies larger pixels (which means lower noise). Pixel density is not always an accurate indicator of the noise levels, since some cameras with low pixel densities still have excessive noise.
There are also moiré issues with small pixel pitches, though at least Canon has done a good job in solving the moiré issue.
Please also see: What a Professional Looks for in a Digital SLR
Wide Angle Lenses, Free Telephotos, Crop Factors, and Chromatic Aberration
Who Needs a
Wide Angle Lens Anyway?
Wide angle lenses are
popular amongst both professionals and amateurs. A wedding photographer
wouldn't dream of not packing a wide-angle lens for those large group
photos of the families, and amateurs often have similar needs. Wide angle
lenses are traditionally the most expensive non-specialty lenses.
x
Crop
Factor/Focal Length Multiplier
x
Except for the very
high end professional models, Digital SLRs use a sensor that is smaller
than a 35mm film frame. They do this for cost reasons. The practical
result of the smaller sensor is that the focal length of all lenses
changes (in terms of what it is on 35mm cameras) because you are shooting
only through the center of the lens, not all the way to the edges. If you
multiply the sensor dimensions by 1.5 to get to the 36mm x 24mm size of a
35mm frame, the camera is said to have a 1.5 crop factor, or a 1.5 focal
length multiplier. A 17-35 wide angle zoom lens now has an equivalent
focal length of 25.5-52.5mm, which is no longer considered wide angle. On
the other hand, a 100-300mm lens becomes a 150-450mm lens. The
photographer with a collection of lenses from his film camera, suddenly
finds that he or she has no wide angle lenses, but has much more telephoto
range than necessary.
x
Wow,
I Get a Much Longer Telephoto Lens, for Free, by Virtue of the Smaller
Sensor!
x
Uh, not necessarily. You can always simulate a
long telephoto by blowing up the center of a full frame sensor. You don't
gain anything, with the smaller sensor unless you're talking about
full frame and sub-full frame with the same number of megapixels.
x
It's "good" thing for telephoto if you assume that the same number of
megapixels in the small sensor would otherwise have been spread across the
greater area of a full size sensor, rather than the full size sensor being
more megapixels (so you're not "wasting" megapixels by cropping a larger
sensor).
x
Screw the
Crop Factor, Just Buy Wider Wide-Angle Lenses
x
The solution for the
amateur, unwilling to spend $8000 on a full frame digital SLR, is to buy
an even wider angle lens. Canon makes a decent 10-22mm lens for their
popular EOS-300D and 20D bodies, which sells for around $650. Sigma is
introducing a 10-20mm wide angle zoom for a variety of mounts, and it's
expected to sell for around $650 as well. Professional photographers, with
a collection of high cost professional lenses, find it more sensible to
spend the extra money on a digital body with a smaller crop factor, than
to buy new lenses (if such lenses are even available in the professional
grade). Canon has professional bodies with a full-size, 36x24mm sensor
(1.0 crop factor), as well as one with a 1.3 crop factor.
x
Chromatic Aberration
with Full Frame Sensors
x
Many professionals limit themselves to 80% or so
of full-frame on full frame digital SLRs (and on film). This is to reduce
chromatic aberration from the edges of the lens. This essentially means
that they are imposing a 1.25 crop factor on themselves. This makes the
Canon EOS-1D Mark II an attractive proposition, since it effectively
enforces shooting through the center of the glass. It's no secret that
shooting center glass has always had advantages, even when using film.
x
There is an excellent discussion of the pros and cons of full frame
sensors at:
http://www.fredmiranda.com/1Ds_review/index_fullframe.html.
Can I Use the Lenses from my old Film SLR on my Digital SLR
Canon: All old EOS lenses can be used on any Canon digital body. Note that the new Canon EF-s lenses can be used only on the 20D, 350D, and 300D.
Konica-Minolta: All A mount lenses can be used with Konica-Minolta digital SLRs. The new Maxxum AF DT lenses cannot be used with older Minolta film bodies. There are some limitations with older lenses, see http://www.dcviews.com/lenses/Minolta-lenses.htm for details.
Pentax: FAJ series lenses can be used. For older lenses, see http://www.dcviews.com/lenses/Pentax-lenses.htm for details.
Nikon: Lens compatibility varies. See "http://www.nikonians.org/html/resources/nikon_articles/other/compatibility.html" for a complete chart that details compatibility. In many cases you can use old lenses but with reduced capability, i.e. no metering. In some cases you can not even mount the lens on the body.
Olympus: Olympus went to a new lens mount, and none of their film camera lenses can be used.
The Endless Nikon Lens Mount Discussion |
For as long as the photo groups on Usenet have been around, there have been discussions about the limitations of the Nikon F mount. These discussions began shortly after Canon abandoned their FD mount, and introduced their EOS mount, because suddenly Canon was able to build lenses that Nikon could not match. There is a web site that details some of the differences between the Canon EOS mount and the Nikon F mount, and explains the issues (http://members.aol.com/photoquack/bayonet.htm) so we will not repeat them here. That site was created prior to the introduction of the Canon or Nikon digital SLRs, so it only mentions film, but most of the issues remain the same. Some of the information is no longer correct, i.e. Nikon now does offer image-stabilized lenses. Most of these issues are not going to be encountered by amateurs, since the types of lenses that Nikon cannot make, and the types of lenses that they do make, but are less than optimal due to the lens mount, are not lenses that the typical amateur would ever purchase. The
biggest myth, still regularly being repeated, is that Nikon's
adherence to the F mount means that all F mount lenses, even very
old ones, can be used on new Nikon bodies. It is true that most of the
lenses can be physically mounted to the body (not all), but in some cases
they will not work at all, in some cases they will work with
partial functionality, and in some cases you can send them to a
third-party for modification (http://home.carolina.rr.com/headshots/Nikonhome.htm).
See
http://www.aiconversions.com/compatibilitytable.htm
for a chart that details compatibility of Nikon bodies
with Nikon lenses. |
Lens Choices
http://www.dcviews.com/ has the best charts on lenses for each brand of digital SLR
Canon: http://www.dcviews.com/lenses/Canon-lenses.htm
Konica-Minolta: http://www.dcviews.com/lenses/Minolta-lenses.htm
Olympus: http://www.dcviews.com/lenses/Olympus-lenses.htm
Nikon: http://www.dcviews.com/lenses/Nikon-lenses.htm
Pentax: http://www.dcviews.com/lenses/Pentax-lenses.htm
Please also see: Sensor Size, Focal Length Multiplier, & Pixel Dimensions
Ratings of
Currently Available Digital SLRs
Unlike some other digital camera
sites, we make an effort to avoid "grade inflation." On one popular digital
camera site, there are basically three ratings: Highly Recommended (Good),
Recommended (Not so Good), and Above Average (Pretty Bad). We suspect than any
review that results in a rating that is less than "Above Average" is simply
not put on the site. It's almost like Starbucks with three coffee sizes with
names that all imply large (tall, grande, venti). Note that many of the
unacceptable cameras have been taken off the market, such as all of the
Kodak digital SLRs, both of the Sigma digital SLRs, and the Olympus E-300,
so we have removed them from the chart. Also, the Olympus E-330, which is
replacing the discontinued Olympus E-300, has not yet
been evaluated (the E-330 uses a new type of sensor, and it is possible that
it will be better than the E-300).
|
Market Segment | |||||
Entry Level | Amateur | Prosumer | Professional | High-End Professional | ||
|
Unacceptable |
Olympus E-500 | Olympus E-1 |
Fuji FinePix S2 Pro Fuji FinePix S3 Pro |
||
Good |
Pentax *istDs2 | Pentax *istD |
|
|
||
Excellent |
Maxxum Dynax 5D* Nikon D70/D70s Olympus E-330 |
Maxxum Dynax 7D | Nikon D2Hs | |||
Superb |
Nikon D50 |
Canon EOS-350D |
Canon EOS-20D Nikon D200 |
Canon EOS-1D Mark II Canon EOS-5D Nikon D2x |
Canon EOS-1Ds Mark II |
Unacceptable
Avoid the
following cameras completely:x
Olympus
E1 Issues: Image quality, Resolution too low, Unacceptably high
noise at higher ISO settings, No built in flash, Lens selection. The
so-called 4:3 standard has not gone anywhere, so do not ever expect a
good selection of lenses. Apparently the E1 is out of production, and
Olympus is selling out of existing inventory.
Olympus Evolt (E-500) Issues: Image quality, no USB 2.0 or Firewire,
Unacceptably high noise at higher ISO settings, No Mirror Lock-Up, Lens
selection. The so-called 4:3 standard has not gone anywhere, so do
not ever expect a good selection of lenses.
x
Fuji
FinePix S2 Pro Issues: AA Batteries only, Requires CR123A in
addition to AA batteries, Slow frame rate, No vertical grip, Lacks
mirror lock-up. Very low noise at high ISO settings is a strong point of
this camera. Image quality is fine if you can live with the other
limitations.
Fuji FinePix S3 Issues: No mirror lock-up is inexcusable in a camera that purports to be professional level. Slow writing speed to memory card, Integrated vertical grip needs more functionality, very slow flash sync, color accuracy. Very low noise at high ISO settings, and wide dynamic range are strong points of this camera, and hence it is a popular portrait studio camera, but that's the only area in which it excels.
Acceptable (click for
review)
The cameras in this category aren't the best choices
for the money, but they are still acceptable if, for example, you already
have lenses that will fit them.
Pentax *istD Issues: Image
quality, no USB 2.0 or Firewire. Still a good choice if you have
existing compatible Pentax lenses, but at $1200 it's just a bit less
than the Canon 20D, which is far superior.
x
Pentax *istDs2 Issues: Requires RAW mode for good image quality, No vertical grip available. Still a good choice if you have existing compatible Pentax lenses, and a good deal at less than $800, though the Canon EOS-350D and Nikon D70s are superior choices in the same $800-1000 price range. Note that there is a firmware upgrade that adds continuous auto-focus to the camera, this was one of the major issues with this camera in the past.
Excellent (click for
review)
The cameras in
this category are really where you should start looking.
Konica Minolta Maxxum 5D
Issues: This is essentially a de-featured Maxxum 7D, intended for the
amateur segment. It is an excellent deal at around $800 for the
body-only. This model is real competition
for the Nikon D70s. It still isn't quite as good as the EOS-350D, but if
you have Minolta lenses already, or if you want the anti-shake in the
camera, then it's pretty compelling.
Konica Minolta Maxxum 7D
Issues: Poor
software for RAW conversion, but you can always buy Photoshop. Key
feature is the built in image stabilization. Be sure that you have the
firmware update that speeds up the USB connection, and that speeds up
writing to the Compact Flash card. Note that on March 10th,
Konica-Minolta announced three new lenses for the 7D, including a
super-wide-angle zoom. which make the 7D a more compelling choice.
Nikon D2Hs Issues: Low resolution, noise levels are too high.
Lowest ISO setting is ISO 200. Biggest strength is the high frame rate.
802.11 wireless communication option is unique. Canon EOS-1D Mark II is
a better choice unless you are committed to the Nikon lens mount. The
Nikon D2x is a better choice for the Nikon lens mount, despite the
higher price, and achieves a good frame rate when used in lower
resolution mode. The D2Hs is a specialty camera for times when
high resolution is not necessary, and where the lack of less than IS0
200 is not an issue.
x
Nikon D70s
Issues:
No ISO 100, Moiré, No mirror-lock-up, No vertical grip connections (there is
an after-market vertical grip that uses cables), More limited useful ISO
range than the Canon EOS-350D, No USB 2.0 or Firewire. A good
choice if you're lens-committed to the Nikon mount, but the moiré
problem is an issue on the D70 that is unacceptable to some users. The Canon EOS-350D
may be a better choice in terms of functionality, except for the lack of
spot metering. The D70's 18-70mm kit lens is better than the 18-55 kit
lens on the EOS-350D, so if you plan to never buy any other lenses the
D70s may be a better choice.
Olympus E-330. The new 7.5 megapixel sensor from Panasonic seems to have sufficiently solved the noise issues that plagued earlier Olympus models. You still won't get low noise at high ISO, like you will with the Nikon D50 or Canon EOS-350D, but stick below ISO 400 and you'll be fine. Some people may scoff at the live-preview feature, but it does have it's advantages, i.e., a camera high on a tripod can still be aimed properly using live-preview. As a long time Olympus film camera fan, I'm glad to see them getting their act together in the D-SLR market. Still, be aware that there's not going to be any upgrade path to prosumer or professional grade cameras if you go the Olympus route, they are strictly playing in the amateur market segment, and the 4:3 system limits their ability to move up-market.
Superb (click for
review)
The cameras in
this category are top of the line in their segment.
Nikon D50
(The D50 is essentially a de-featured D70, at a lower price, hence it
shares many of the same issues with the D70, but at the lower price
these are acceptable compromises). Issues: No ISO 100, Moiré, No mirror-lock-up, No vertical grip connections.
Nikon has moved to a cheaper, 18-55mm kit lens, similar to the
kit lens on the EOS-350D and EOS-300D. Best
sub-$600 digital SLR on the market.
Canon EOS-350D
(Digital Rebel XT) Issues: No
spot metering. Best
sub-$1000 digital SLR on the market.
Canon EOS-30D
Issues: None.
Best
sub-$1500 digital SLR on the market.
Canon
EOS-1D Mark II
Issues: No professional grade, super-wide-angle zoom lenses, that
sufficiently compensate for the 1.3 crop factor, are available. There
are second-tier amateur quality super-wide-angle lenses available, but
these may not be suitable for professional use.
Best $5000 digital SLR on the market. Beats
the D2x despite being lower resolution, by virtue of its lower noise at
higher ISOs, and by its smaller crop factor.
Canon
EOS-1Ds Mark II Best digital SLR on
the market (not including
medium format models).
Nikon D200. An
excellent choice if you're
lens-committed to the Nikon mount. This is the long-awaited D100
replacement.
Nikon D2x (Review 2, Review 3) This is Nikon's answer to the EOS-1D Mark II. Issues: Very big crop factor for a professional grade camera. Noise above ISO 400 is too high for such an expensive camera, though this was expected due to the extremely small pixel size. No professional grade super-wide-angle zoom lenses, that sufficiently compensate for the 1.5 crop factor, are available yet. Encrypted white balance information in RAW file severely limits post processing options, though there are some illegal workarounds to this limitation. Lower frame rate than the EOS-1D Mark II at full resolution, but a higher frame rate is available if you use only 6.8 megapixels.
Look at the reputable on-line photographic retailers such as Adorama and B&H. Some models of digital SLRs are priced better at non-photographic equipment internet retailers such as Amazon.com. The dominance of Canon in digital SLRs has had the side effect of making Canon products available at big discounts from non-camera retailers, such as Amazon.com, while this isn't the case with Nikon or other manufacturers. For Amazon.com, look for periodic discounts and coupons. Buydig.com is often the cheapest reliable store, but lately they've had an annoying habit of only offering bundles (memory cards, etc.) on some popular models.
Brick and mortar retailers, while usually more expensive, do have some advantages, and some will come pretty close to on-line pricing if you ask nicely. You'll likely have a more difficult time returning an item to a camera store than to a place like Amazon.
Amazon periodically has promotions that provide a future Amazon credit, from $50 to $150. The credits are sent in an e-mail, six weeks or so after the purchase.
Since many people depend on reviews to help them decide which equipment to purchase, it's important to know if the review you're reading is unbiased or not. There are some camera review sites that are nothing more than propaganda mouthpieces to promote a specific brand or model of camera.
Relatively Unbiased Digital Camera Reviews
http://www.bobatkins.com/photography/
(Canon only)
http://stevesdigicams.com
http://luminous-landscape.com/reviews/
http://digitalcamerashortlist.com
http://www.imaging-resource.com
http://www.bythom.com
Biased Digital Camera Reviews
http://www.naturfotograf.com/index2.html
http://www.moosepeterson.com/digitaldarkroom/index.html
http://kenrockwell.com You are unlikely to ever find a site with so much incorrect information. We read it just to see what amusing new crap is put up there each week! From his claim that he gets 4 million hits a month, to the incorrect statements about sensor technology, sensor size, and ISO speeds, and available lenses for the competition, his site is a treasure trove of misinformation. And he has the cojones to ask for donations for his site! We especially liked his claim that the D70s was not a real product!
Direct Links to Purchase Equipment at Amazon or Adorama
If You Found this Site Useful, Please Support Us by Using these Direct Links to Purchase Products, Thanks. No lies here, when you purchase using these links, we get a commission. It doesn't cost you anything extra. We're not getting rich off this, we've collected only a few thousand dollars over several years.
Canon Entry Level and Amateur Digital SLRs |
|||
Canon EOS-3000D Body Only |
Canon EOS-3000D with 18-55 EF-S Lens |
Canon EOS-350D (Digital Rebel XT) Body Only |
Canon EOS-350D (Digital Rebel XT) with 18-55 EF-S Lens |
Coming Soon |
Coming Soon |
||
Coming Soon |
Coming Soon |
Buy From |
Buy From |
Canon Prosumer Digital SLRs |
|||
Canon EOS-20D Body Only |
Canon EOS-20D with 18-55 Lens |
Canon |
Canon |
Coming Soon |
|||
Buy From |
Buy From |
Coming Soon |
Canon Professional Digital SLRs |
||
Canon |
Canon |
Canon |
Not
Available from Amazon |
Not
Available from Amazon |
|
Buy From |
Popular Lenses for Canon EOS Digital SLRs |
|||||
Canon |
Canon EF 17-85mm Image Stabilized Lens |
Canon EF 28-135mm Image Stabilized Lens |
Canon EF 100-300 Lens |
Canon EF 70-300mm Image Stabilized Lens |
Canon EF 24-105mm L Lens |
Buy From |
|||||
Remember to Purchase Lens Hoods and Filters |
Battery Grips for Canon EOS Digital SLRs |
||
BGE3 Battery Grip for EOS 350D |
BGE2 Battery Grip for EOS 20D/20Da |
BGE4 Battery Grip for EOS 5D |
Popular Accessories for Canon EOS Digital SLRs |
||||
EH17L Semi-Hard Case for EOS 20D/20Da |
580EX Flash |
RS-80N3 Remote Switch for EOS-1D Mark II, 10D, 20D |
Lemmar DVC-511 AC/DC Charger for BP-511 Batteries | |
Buy From |
Note: Konica-Minolta is Exiting the
Digital Camera Business and Has Sold the Digital SLR portion of the Business
to Sony.
However they are still selling their two D-SLR products, and lenses will
continue to be available.
Nikon Digital SLRs |
||||
Nikon D50 Body Only |
Nikon |
Nikon |
Nikon |
Nikon |
Not
Available |
Not
Available |
|||
Buy From |
Buy From |
Buy From |
Nikon Digital SLRs |
|||||
Nikon D200 with 18-200 Vibration-Reduction Lens |
Nikon D200 with 18-70mm Lens |
Nikon D200 Body Only |
Nikon D2Hs Body Only | Nikon D2X Body Only |
Nikon D3H Full Frame Digital SLR |
Not
Available from Amazon |
Not
Available from Amazon |
Not
Available from Amazon |
Not
Available |
Not
Available from Amazon |
Coming Soon |
Buy From |
Buy From |
Buy From |
Coming Soon |
Popular Accessories for Nikon Digital SLRs |
|||||
CF-D100 Case for Nikon D100 |
ML-L3 IR Remote for D70 |
SB-800 | |||
Buy From |
|||||
Remember to Purchase Lens Hoods and Filters |
Olympus Digital SLRs |
|
Olympus
E-330 Evolt |
Olympus
E-300 Evolt |
Not yet
on |
Pentax Digital SLRs |
|||
Pentax |
Pentax |
Pentax |
Pentax |
If the item you are trying to buy doesn't have a direct link, please enter Amazon or Adorama using the links below. Thanks!
The Amazon.com Visa Card is a pretty good deal, with a 3% discount, paid in Amazon gift certificates, for purchases made at Amazon.com. You get a $20 credit for your first order. You earn three points for every dollar you spend at Amazon and one point for every dollar you spend elsewhere. After 2500 points ($834 spent at Amazon) you get a $25 Amazon Credit. There is no annual fee. The Interest rate isn't very good, so this is not a card to keep a balance on. We appreciate it very much when you use the link below to sign up for the Amazon Visa Card. |
Accolades for DigitalSLRInfo.com
"The whole
thing seems well thought out and well organized, to lead the reader through
the various considerations."
"Your web site is great. Thanks for making the info available."
"Excellent reading...thanks. You presented a very fair, and detailed summary
for prospective first-time dSLR owners. I happen to be in that category, so
your article couldn't have come at a better time."
"Good work on the chart!"
"Thanks for the great DSLR information. Really apprecisted <sic>."
"I want to thank you for all the hard work you've put into this grid. I wish it had been around when I was debating on getting my Digital Rebel. And "good on ya" for sticking to your guns in all the unnecessary abuse that's been heaped on you for choices you made in the grid. A virtual handshake and pat on the back to you! 8-)"
What Does a Professional Look for in a Digital SLR?
This is a work in progress, so please be patient. It was rushed out after becoming aware that some Usenet posters had absolutely no idea of what constituted a professional level camera. The topics that are covered are:
Click for Article Regarding What a Professional Looks for in a Digital SLR
Sensor Size, Focal Length Multiplier, & Pixel Dimensions
This section was added because lately we've seen a rash of incorrect statements regarding sensor size, focal length multiplier, and pixel dimensions. This section includes the following topics:
Click for Article Regarding Sensor Size, Focal Length Multiplier, & Pixel Dimensions
Other Useful Nordic Group Web Sites
Digital Camera Short
List
Looking for a non-SLR Digital Camera? Check out:
http://digitalcamerashortlist.com
Travel Tripods
Looking
for a Travel Tripod? Check out:
http://nordicgroup.us/tripod
NiMH Battery Chargers
Looking
for NiMH Battery Chargers? Check out: http://nordicgroup.us/chargers
This is a non-commercial, informational site. | |
Nothing is sold on this site. | |
No advertising is accepted. | |
Cameras are accepted for testing purposes only. | |
We do not work for, or own stock in, any camera manufacturer. | |
We receive affiliate fees from Amazon and Adorama, when visitors to this site are kind enough to enter these sites via my affiliate links, and make purchases. | |
This site has upset a few people, who don't like to see a piece of equipment that they have purchased being criticized for any reason. It is not the purpose of this site to disparage the choices that any individuals have made. |
Feedback: Send comments to scharf.steven@geemail.com but change the ISP to gmail.com
© 2006, The Nordic Group