
While the City of Cupertino does not have any authority over the Foothill-De Anza Community College District, and how they spend their money, I would encourage the District to use some of the money from the recently passed $898 million Measure G bond measure to address the issue of housing insecurity of students.
None of the cities in the District have the funds or the ability to solve the issue of housing insecurity for De Anza or Foothill students. The most recent project in Cupertino, the 18 unit Veranda project, cost nearly $800,000 per unit, and these were 350 square foot studio apartments. The City paid for the land, and the County and non-profits provided money for construction. De Anza could build some student and/or teacher housing on their campus, or purchase existing apartment buildings using the Measure G money for construction or renovation. We are in one of the wealthiest areas in the United States. We can do better than having students living in cars. Voters generously approved an $898 million bond measure for the Community College District in order to address the needs of the colleges, including housing.
Long-term, ALL California cities should advocate for increased State funding for community colleges statewide in an effort to bring all community colleges up to the high educational standards of De Anza and Foothill colleges. Housing insecurity for students would be reduced if students did not feel compelled to attend community colleges far from their homes in order to get a proper education. In the meantime, Foothill and De Anza colleges have an obligation to use some of the Measure G bond money to address housing insecurity for students. The residents of cities in the Community College District are paying the $898 million for Measure G even though a majority of Foothill and De Anza students do not come from cities in the District. This funding should certainly be sufficient to address the problem.
The other issue we have in Cupertino, with regards to subsidized housing, is that the property owners that have approved projects, all of which include some Below Market Rate housing, are not moving forward with construction. This is due to multiple factors, but the biggest issue is the current glut of unaffordable market-rate housing. Normally, the high-rent market-rate housing would subsidize the Below Market Rate housing, but even before the Covid-19 pandemic developers were choosing not to build their approved projects.
The city of Cupertino has one of the best jobs to housing ratios in the area and has entitled 3,457 residential units, far above and beyond the 1,064 residential units required by RHNA, but only 19 units of our 1,400 RHNA entitlement have been built (an additional 2057 units, over and above the 1,400 units in our Housing Element, have been entitled). We have no way to force developers to actually build their projects.
Paid for by Steven Scharf for Cupertino City Council 2020 FPPC ID #1388099